Just for clarification, the “Organized Editing Best Practice(s)” is a draft document that was never adopted. The adopted set of guidelines is called “Organised Editing Guidelines” and is available here https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/6/62/Organised_Editing_Guidelines.pdf
Among other things, the guidelines ask organised team to add their projects to this list: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities
I notice Uber haven’t done that yet, and I would encourage you to prioritize these steps, and pause your mapping until you have demonstrated that you want to be good citizen of the OSM ecosystem.
I have also noticed that some of the user profile pages of the people working for you have a boilerplate text very commonly used by a big outsourcing firm: “I am and I am happy to be contributing to the Uber OSM project. In my free time, ”. While a personal touch in a user profile is certainly nice, seeing hundreds of user profiles following that exact same structure means that it’s not really personal at all. For us, it would be much more useful if instead of a list of hobbies, the profile had concrete links to the projects they are working on, so we can understand what data sources they are using and what their goals are, and whom we can contact if something goes wrong. If you are using workers from an outsourcing company, then it would also be helpful to be transparent about this (because their training will often not have come from the client but from the employer, and if they make systematic mistakes we know that we need to approach the employer to improve the training). Ideally, the user profile would then say: “Hello, I am X, I am employed at and I work on the following projects for Uber: ”.
Bye
Frederik