Nevertheless I want full refund from your Complaints Department.
I think it would be a useful feedback to your PR department that it is usually not needed, apart from managing different permissions (eg. validators) per areas.
Well I mainly meant about it’s apparent purpose, not their ideology. We use HOT TM locally to handle our mapping coordination (for example when we get new aerial or a request to quiclky map an area for cookies), but we do not use it for Humanitarian (or any other special) purposes. I am not entirely happy with it, especially not the usually breaking (or wrecking havoc) kind of update mechanism.
Indeed right, they worth every penny you are paying for them. My impression was that the UI is a kind of debug UI for developers and testers but it is neither designed to be used nor does it fit the purpose. I believe the general UI of the HOT TM is quite usable, and it is probably not that complex to mimic, but I guess you’re busy enjoying the backend and nobody volunteered to design an orgasm-inducing interface just yet.
Still, let me encourage you, since the project seems to be very nice from a specific distance (I may change my mind if I get closer and cannot drop docker from the view successfully), and pretty useful in its tinyness, compared to the seriously obese HOT TM.
I will try to play with it a bit more, and try to understand what kind of effect those drugs had which resulted this UI, and use this knowledge to grok it all.
All in all: it seem to be a very nice project.