Huh. Steve’s plan for OSM hasn’t changed since 2012, in eleven years! He used the same premise in his 2014 Board elections. Only now it’s hard to not feel a subtext of “we hired you as the OSM guy, why map not good yet”.
Not a strategy by definition, and certainly not something that would benefit OSM on the long run. But I’m a tiny bit positively surprised with productive replies from the community (I expected it to just be ignored due to that there’s nothing to add to previous discussions).