[RFC] Feature Proposal - landcover proposal V2

General talk Tagging general discussion
,
186

I’m also trying to understand what scenario we’re talking about.

It could be:

  • key.v1=value
  • key=value.v1
  • v1.key=value
  • key=v1.value
  • key:v1=value
  • key=value:v1
  • v1:key=value
  • key=v1:value

And if so, as for one of these, it is inconceivable, impractical in the long term and would only bring more work, is that it? Or could something be worked on with this?