supsup
November 5, 2024, 2:26pm
37
I am filling the bugs but I wonder if it is appropriate for iD. I tried grepping its source for tag_info and found nothing. When I played with it, it suggested me values like =1 or =yeswhich are wrong. It seems tome iD is populating the suggestions on the fly somehow and so asking it to include strolling is meaningless, no? I added a bug but I am not sure it mapes sense:
openstreetmap:main ← felagund:main
opened 02:56PM - 05 Nov 24 UTC
Following an approved proposal ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:A… dd_strolling_to_sac_scale_and_some_further_refinements ), sac_scale got a new value: strolling. Adding it to the schema. it has not T1-T6 value.
Pull request for josm:
JOSM:master ← felagund:felagund-sacscale-strolling
opened 04:27PM - 05 Nov 24 UTC
An approved proposal added strolling to sac_scale: https://wiki.openstreetmap.or… g/wiki/Proposal:Add_strolling_to_sac_scale_and_some_further_refinements
Over time, the definition of the scale evolved, which was also codifiedby the approval process, so updating the wording to the current state of affairs.
Pull request for Vespucci:
simonpoole:master ← felagund:master
opened 05:04PM - 05 Nov 24 UTC
Thiscombines these two proposed changes to JOSM:
https://github.com/JOSM/josm/p… ull/146
https://github.com/JOSM/josm/pull/145
It updates trail_visibility to wiki and makes the keys more understandable (how is one suppposed to understand a difference between bad and horrible)?
The one about sac_scale implements an approved proposal that added strolling to sac_scale: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Add_strolling_to_sac_scale_and_some_further_refinements
Over time, the definition of the scale evolved, which was also codifiedby the approval process, so updating the wording to the current state of affairs too.