To be clear; at this point I think we should assume my interpretation of the law is correct unless;
- The counterparty, or others, express that they explicitly disagree with my interpretation.
- Said parties present reasonable arguments. That is, I don’t think the counterparty should be able to say “no, I think you’re wrong, but I won’t defend my position, because I don’t need to. Go get a ruling from the municipality… which you can’t
”.