Topics on this forum have “Share” feature, proving a popup dialog with amoung others a link, and the first button is to share the link on X.com (née Twitter.com).
I’m Jewish and I’m telling you that this forum doesn’t have this option, and what’s more, even on YouTube, Instagram, Mail, Facebook, there are neo-Nazis all over the internet. You can’t ban the use of the entire internet because of this [I hope you didn’t have political thoughts in this post]
It is possible to remove these share options through configuration. I would argue that it would make sense to remove both Twitter and Facebook share options. Let’s let this sit for a few days to see if anyone has an issue with it.
I see no issue in having a way to share OSM content as widely and easily as possible, more options should be offered, not less. Millions of people use X. OSM should not be in the business of making content harder to share simply because a platform hosts speech that doesn’t align with a particular political belief.
My argument against Twitter links in this forum is that they’re somewhat inaccessible to people here who don’t have a Twitter account. That doesn’t really apply the other way around - sharing content from here to Twitter might improve the standard of the discourse** there, who knows.
I’ve always found share buttons like these to be pointless user interface clutter. Get rid of them all and just provide a copy url button for universal sharing everywhere. Otherwise you end up with a bajillion different buttons covering many many different services.
This. And some of the social media platforms offer a preview of the link posted.
I would assume that nowadays the only reason one would want a share button for specific social media, would be to auto-open that social media with the post already filled with the link, and occasionally prefilled with other info aswell, like title of the topic, which I don’t see it being done recent years. In the past it was common.
an additional reason to drop a platform is “it is a closed environment that we deem incompatible with the spirit of OSM”
“we shold remove X links because the platform condones $something, where $something is deemed incompatible with the spirit of OSM, and we do not want to endorse the platform by linking to it” is also a totally legit reason, and applies to X for a variety of $somethings. I would prefer it if you, @GA_Kevin, could refrain from belittling this as “I saw some non-OSM posts that ruffled my feathers”.
We are not a monolith, we all have different beliefs, especially political. To say content that isn’t related to OSM warrants OSM community action is purely political activism, which should have no place in OSM, regardless of ideology.
I guess I just don’t see OSM as a moral compass and something we should limit the reach of because of non-OSM content on the web. The internet is full of places I find objectionably horrible, but I’m still on it everyday and can see the use for good, valuable dialog and communication just as I do X.
I don’t agree with the confederacy in the US but I’m in the rural south of Georgia with plenty of names and statues honoring that time. If I don’t agree with that, should I not map it? Where do we draw the line if we’re going to insert morality into OSM?