Sometimes I feel like we get so caught up in trying to make each unique real world situation comply with established OSM guidelines[1], that we lose sight of making the data useful to consumers. Is any data consumer well served with some CCCs being mapped as one boundary, while others are mapped as two separate but coextensive boundaries? If it is always done one way or the other that will clearly be wrong/inconvenient/annoying for some use cases. It would at least be consistent and predictable, though. Maybe consistent inconvenience for some use cases is better than inconsistent inconvenience for all use cases?
In this case One feature, one OSM element - OpenStreetMap Wiki âŠī¸