Looking at the changeset comments, all they did was clicking the preferred solution suggested by their editor. I would not call that going through trouble.
Perhaps the wording changed, I mentioned above, for my taste, there are too many CS comments closed:osmose:1070 that I observe. @Minh_Nguyen – would it be possible for the editor to suggest in addition to adding a ford/bridge/whatever – There is no stream there?
PS: This is the US chat, but I am feeling very much at home, here people map fords where there are culverts, sometimes they even map bridges on roads in the wrong locations, map culverts where there are bridges and map bridges where there are culverts, and so on, because all of that bad imported governmental data and bad aerials that are of no help to determine actual ground truth. Wishing a bit of survey on location from the community!