Hello @julcnx ,
I just noticed your wiki page now.
After reading it, I have the impression the role you are looking for does not fit well with the definition of a “moderator”. It sounds more like you are looking for a way to change governance of OSM.
A moderator is keeping an eye on discussions and reminds people to keep on track with the discussion. In case a discussion goes too much off-topic, this is a task for moderation. Also in case a topic is branching into two distinct topics a moderator might split it into individual topics.
A moderator will remind participants of the etiquette in case the discussion is getting too harsh. We want to be polite, friendly and constructive in discussions. This could worst-case result in blocking specific accounts.
(remark: I had to remind users only rarely about etiquette. As moderator I did tolerate stronger words against non-human entities like generic “Facebook” to a larger degree than I would if you directly attack specific persons)
A moderator also helps cleaning up discussions from SPAM posts which try to advertise commercial services or similar content unrelated to OSM.
What a moderator is not doing: A moderator is no court instance to do a final decision on something like tagging schemes. A moderator is not giving tasks or steering the community by telling what to map or what to not map.
This type of governance is not happening in OSM. It is not done by moderators. And it is also not done by local chapters.
So a moderator will not solve the initial topic you brought up, which is the frustration of the very few active local contributors which happens dues to often low quality large scale remote organized editing.
This remote editing involves large companies like Facebook, Grab or TomTom, as well the organized charity companies like HOT brining in remote mappers for mapping events.
I suggest to keep these two topics separated.
I did recently apply for creation of a subforum here in discourse. Once it is available, I propose to bring this topic of remote mapping campaigns up again.
We could continue here to discuss the topic about moderator process.