I am looking at the data in Moncton, NB and noticed a fair amount of incorrect data.
Most stops have incorrectly “Codiac Transit” listed as operator and no value in network
The proposed change would be to add the following:
network=Codiac Transpo
network:wikidata=Q2981688
and remove all operator attributes on bus stops. All the bus lines are part of the Codiac Transpo network but are operated by each of the 3 cities of Greater Moncton (Moncton, Dieppe, Riverview) respectively on a line per line basis.
moreover, the stops use the depreciated gtfs_id=* attribute. The City of Moncton publishes GTFS data, what’s the best way to update the stops with gtfs:stop_id:[[Key:|]]=*
Main focus of PTNA are OSM’s public transport route relations, but GTFS is supported as well. A comparison between OSM and GTFS is suppoted on a ‘per OSM route’ basis.
To support your area and ‘network’, I would need the following information
PTNA analysis
name of cities/counties where the service is provided (I take the wikidata of the relations)
name of the ‘network’
location in the OSM wiki, where to store a CSV list of existing (bus) routes, I can make a suggestion though
GTFS
URL of the GTFS *.zip
which license is used, is it compatible with OSM?
Edit: 2024-07-07 15:53 UTC GTFS analysis is available as well
A comparison between OSM data and GTFS feed data is currently not possible.
This comparison is based on OSM platform (PTv2) data - no platforms are included in the OSM route relations.
